Tck 59 2 maddesi nedir

Kollukta avukat olmadan ifade verdim.

Pursuant to Art. The lack of any limitation concerning the encountered crime which would create the obligation to report caused the medical professionals to face an obligation of substantial extent. Throughout the analysis of the crime, the doctrinal discussions concerning the crime are evaluated. The crime aims to protect the effectiveness of judicial functions, with the purposes of providing an effective investigation of crimes, realizing the purposes of criminal law, and protecting public order. This paper argues that medical professionals in both public and private sectors may be perpetrators, even though the prevailing opinion is that only medical professionals who are not public officials may commit Art.

Tck 59 2 maddesi nedir

.

Emrah dedi ki:. Mehmet dedi ki:. Hakkimda hakatet ve tehditten dava acilmis.

.

TCK vb. Cankurtaranlar TCK 22 6 maddesi nedir? We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent. Cookie Settings Accept All.

Tck 59 2 maddesi nedir

Madde Nesne sayili Kanun 59 maddesi nedir? We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent. Cookie Settings Accept All.

Kurumi tokisaki sad

Anahtar Kelimeler: Medical professional , Obligation to report an offence , Crimes against the judiciary , Patient-doctor privilege , Right to be excused from testifying. Gamze dedi ki:. Samet dedi ki:. Saydamdavran dedi ki:. Mehmet dedi ki:. Yavuz dedi ki:. Yusuf dedi ki:. However, this paper is in the view that such a distinction was not the aim of the legislator and would lead to erroneous consequences. Ecrin dedi ki:. Bayram yilmaz dedi ki:. Gelen tebligatta basit yargilama usulu uygulanacaktir diyor. Maysa dedi ki:. The issue of aggregation of these two types of crimes is to be solved through the application of the rules of conceptual aggregation. USER98 dedi ki:. Merhaba ben komsumla kavga etmisim iki sene once,karakola gittik ama karsilikli sikayetci olmadik, olayda balta oldugu icin bize mahkeme gunu vermisler, balta vardi elimde ama kimseye bisey olmadi, balta silah olarak geciyormus, komsumla suan baristik zaten, mahkeme olmadan iptal edilebilirmi acba.

.

Duygu dedi ki:. Nurcan sahin dedi ki:. The patient of the medical professional may be the perpetrator, the victim or a mere witness. Haydar ulusoy dedi ki:. Maysa dedi ki:. Lastly, the will of the individual from whom the crime is learnt is insignificant, even when that individual is the victim and the investigation of the crime is bound to legal complaint. The punishment prescribed in Art. Nursen dedi ki:. Kamu davasina donusmus sanirim karsi taraf avukatta tutmus. The view presented in this paper is that Art. However, in light of Art.