Voat.co

Registered users could then vote on these submissions.

Voat was founded as a neutral free-speech platform. After alt-right extremists were booted off reddit, they found a new home there. Kind of like that "paradox of intolerance" meme. Free speech platforms usually end up becoming extremist platforms. I remember going on voat a couple years ago and the front page was filled with anti-Semitic and white nationalist propaganda, and racial slurs were everywhere. Even non-political subverses had an alt-right tinge.

Voat.co

It rose in popularity in , when Reddit banned groups that promoted violence against women , and eventually others popularising racism. Since then, the website had reportedly been host to other antisemitic and racist content, and had apparently been approached by an unnamed US agency due to the large quantity of death threats made on the platform. More recently, the site was a gateway to QAnon conspiracy theorists , who claim without any evidence that there is a covert operation to oust President Trump and that there is a secret sect of elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media. It is likely that users of Voat would move to other alternative networks, such as Gab and Parler. Gab is infamous for being host to antisemitic conspiracy theories from the Pittsburgh shooter, who is accused of killing 11 Jewish people at the Tree of Life synagogue in Parler describes itself as "unbiased social media focused on real user experiences and engagement" that allows "free expression without violence and no censorship. Anti-Muslim far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer. Candace Owens and Katie Hopkins also use the platform. Discussion of Voat on those platforms is currently scarce. I tried Voat. I was so conditioned to SJWs [social justice warriors] calling me a racist I took it as a compliment. Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies. Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in Please refresh your browser to be logged in.

Later, after some users speculated that the site had been a sting operation secretly funded by intelligence agencies, Chastain added an addendum. It's bad because it's racism isn't all that voat.co at stamping it out, voat.co.

By Adi Robertson , a senior tech and policy editor focused on VR, online platforms, and free expression. Adi has covered video games, biohacking, and more for The Verge since Voat co-founder Justin Chastain announced the pending closure yesterday, saying the site had run out of money after an investor defaulted on their contract in March. Voat was founded in and hosted Reddit-like forums with minimal moderation. Voat also provided a home for the QAnon conspiracy movement after it was purged from most other platforms. Voat had a close brush with death in

As social-news site Reddit tries to clean up its act by limiting some speech, an alternative springs up, promising to be more freewheeling. With all the drama surrounding Reddit, from debates over free speech to its messy game of musical chairs among executives, it's understandable some users might want to leave. Now they've found a place to go. It's called Voat rhymes with goat , and it says it's fixed all those things people don't like about Reddit. The site launched in April and was originally called WhoaVerse. It started as a part-time project of a third-year Swedish college student and now the site claims to be run by two students who are "currently studying computer science and economics at University of Zurich in Switzerland.

Voat.co

Voat, the Reddit clone where hate speech has been festering for years, has shut down for good. The platform has hinted at shutting its doors in the past, but this time it's official. If you head to Voat, you'll see a page that reads "Voat was sacrificed on December 25th, Voat made its debut in , and marketed itself as a Reddit alternative for free speech. However, the platform quickly became a safe haven for hate speech and toxic content. Voat co-founder, Justin Chastain, announced the closure in his final post on Voat. The platform basically ran out of funding, and Chastain noted that he "can't keep it up. In my opinion, Voat is and will always be the biggest dysfunctional family on the internet. According to the post, Voat lost funding in March , and that's when things took a turn for the worse. Since then, Chastain's been paying for the site out of his own pocket, but he now admitted that he's "out of money.

Refuse synonym

Its not that free speech platforms are destined to fail, its anonymity. Obviously these particular topics have been done to death, but someone has to hold this discussion for the first time on a given platform. You need to nip that in the bud. In order to have a good community, you need a form of censorship, whether through moderation, spam detection, voting systems, and so on. We have to worry about Stalinists as well as Nazis though, because Stalin killed more people than Hitler. Retrieved July 8, — via Yahoo! There aren't that many feeling "I want to talk about fanged Jews forming shadowy cabals to suck the blood of gentle babies in the night". If you've seen a neighboring store burned you feel one way, if you've seen a neighbor threatened you feel another. Maybe I should expand a bit more To know how to defend them you have to know they exist. I'm just curious what people say that does this. Archived from the original on December 22, If you have something useful to say you can make a non troll account for it. But yeah, for every polite person in some isolated corner there were 50 screaming about politics on the front page.

Sign in. Sign in Register.

Don't you create polarization this way? Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. It turns out just discouraging them from having an SSO that lets them go to the other parties is enough to get them to leave you alone. What you're describing makes it worse , but even in its absence there is a certain vocal subset of humanity for whom dominating a discussion is its own reward. Archived from the original on February 2, This is by far the most important point. I don't think it is effortless to refute. If it ever was an act. If a drug league would exist, players would be pressured to take part to the very limit of what's legal, health be damned - as they already are in regular leagues. MisterTea on Dec 22, root parent prev next [—].