Rust vs crystal

I often look in dismay at the growing popularity of Go and wonder if Crystal could ever catch up. Really, programming languages are a lot rust vs crystal people in real life

You often hear about how fast languages like Rust and Go are. People port all kinds of things to Rust to make them faster. It's common to hear about a company porting a Ruby microservice to Go or writing native extensions for a dynamic language in Rust for extra performance. Crystal also compiles your apps into blazing-fast native code, so today I decided to try comparing Rust and Crystal side-by-side in talking to a Redis database. They're CPU-intensive, absolutely, but they're nothing like the workload a typical web app has.

Rust vs crystal

When comparing Crystal and Rust, it's important to understand the key differences between these two languages to determine which one is best suited for a specific project or use case. Memory management : Crystal uses a garbage collector for automatic memory management, while Rust relies on a unique ownership system that ensures memory safety without the need for garbage collection. This gives Rust a performance advantage in situations where strict memory control is crucial. Concurrency model : Rust emphasizes on thread safety with its ownership and borrowing system, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs. On the other hand, Crystal provides lightweight fibers for concurrency, which can be more approachable for developers new to concurrent programming. Type system : Crystal features a more conventional object-oriented type system with static typing, similar to languages like Ruby. In contrast, Rust employs a strong static type system with lifetimes and borrowing rules, providing strict compile-time checks for memory safety and thread concurrency. Error handling : Rust uses the Result type and the Option type to handle errors and nullable values, ensuring that errors are handled explicitly by the developer. In comparison, Crystal uses exceptions for error handling, which can simplify code but may also lead to unexpected behavior if not properly managed. Community and ecosystem : Rust has a larger and more mature ecosystem with established libraries and tools for various use cases, making it easier to find support and resources for development. Crystal, while growing rapidly, has a smaller community and fewer libraries available, which can impact the ease of development in certain scenarios.

Needs advice. If you want to try Crystal without installing anything, I made a "crystal-docker-quickstart" project template you can clone [5].

However, I would like to ask the Rust experts if, to their knowledge, I might miss something essential by using Crystal rather than Rust. I like that there is no implicit null and the inferred static types. These are also the things I love most about Rust. There is some sweet ruby class stuff in crystal, but I have made fantastic experiences with the trait system from Rust and I prefer those over classes. For me, traits are a refreshing alternative to the prominent Java-like object oriented type systems. This approach does not result in complex inheritance trees or diamond problems or hidden inherited properties.

When comparing Crystal and Rust, it's important to understand the key differences between these two languages to determine which one is best suited for a specific project or use case. Memory management : Crystal uses a garbage collector for automatic memory management, while Rust relies on a unique ownership system that ensures memory safety without the need for garbage collection. This gives Rust a performance advantage in situations where strict memory control is crucial. Concurrency model : Rust emphasizes on thread safety with its ownership and borrowing system, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs. On the other hand, Crystal provides lightweight fibers for concurrency, which can be more approachable for developers new to concurrent programming. Type system : Crystal features a more conventional object-oriented type system with static typing, similar to languages like Ruby.

Rust vs crystal

I often look in dismay at the growing popularity of Go and wonder if Crystal could ever catch up. Really, programming languages are a lot like people in real life For me, Crystal is like the unpopular, down-to-earth nerdy kid, who once you meet him you wonder why he isn't running the whole school — or at least, the nerdy non-mainstream parts of the school where Go and Rust rule supreme. Obviously JavaScript and probably Python are running the show at the top of the hierarchy, wearing their undeserved varsity jackets and cheer-leading uniforms or whatever the modern zoomer equivalent is of this worn-out 90s trope. I really like Crystal. I think it absolutely nails that sweet spot between high level syntactic sugar and low level systems programming features and performance.

Pata caricatura

Python is easy to learn but you would not get the underpinnings of memory and pointers, an important aspect of programming. Most of the rest are terrible, terrible misfeatures as well. I wonder if it's because it resembles Ruby that people don't take it seriously. The hard part about benchmarking anything that connects to a server is that the server may actually be your bottleneck. I bet it's hard to be motivated to build numbers 2 or 3 when number 4 isn't getting attention. Right down to, that there even are cars which work on water! I know Python, Go and quite a few other languages. Really I find Crystal to be so much more ergonomic and pleasant to use than Go or Rust, though I could see that being a matter of opinion. For my main backend language, I am deciding between Python , Rust , and Go. Because redis::pipe doesn't take the connection as an argument, it looks like it's acting as a buffer and sending all the pipelined commands afterward with the query method. The pipeline implementation is here — you can see that it just wraps a connection and overrides run which I believe is the equivalent of cmd in the Rust client. Still it would be interesting to see how you achieve these impressive results incase there is something to steal ;. Python always seemed like it was cobbled together poorly. I hope this helped you in making your decision, and welcome to the world of programming!

Do you love Ruby? Do you wish there was a better version of Ruby with blazing-fast performance like C?

If you start learning programming I'd suggest Python language. Like to program front-end apps? Not having to guess what a method or block returns and instead having the compiler tell you when you get it wrong makes an enormous difference. JS and Python. The benchmark I went with was to connect to a Redis database and run a bunch of pipelined commands. DennisP 10 months ago root parent prev next [—]. I have used kotlin, and I like it, but not enough to ditch all my Java code. Let us discuss use Chinese in TG,Discord, and do something together. Counterpoint: why should I care if it "takes off"? Ah, okay. See jobs for Crystal. Lucas Chitolina - Mar 5. So programmer productivity is another feature that needs to be promoted about Crystal. I was really confused!