Quanta magazine

Quantum algorithms can find their way out of mazes exponentially faster than quanta magazine ones, at the cost of forgetting the paths they took. In steganography, an ordinary message masks the presence of a secret communication, quanta magazine.

Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism. Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent online publication launched by the Simons Foundation to enhance public understanding of science. Why Quanta? The best traditional news organizations provide excellent reporting on applied areas of science such as health, medicine, technology, engineering and the environment. We strive to complement and augment existing media coverage. Our work often resembles journalistic alchemy — we mash together the complexities of science with the malleable art of storytelling in an attempt to forge a precious new alloy. It can be a mind-bending enterprise, but we relish the challenge.

Quanta magazine

Not the actual death of the magazine, just someone getting upset about lack of depth in an article. They simulated some aspects of wormhole dynamics under the crucial assumption that the holographic correspondence of the Sachdev—Ye—Kitaev model holds. I seriously doubt that many of it's readers have sufficiently deep knowledge of QC to properly understand the Sachdev—Ye—Kitaev model. Whatever that is. Edit: Just to be clear, I'm not disputing that the Quanta article is factually deficient - although I don't have the relevant specialist knowledge to understand why. I am disputing that this marks the "death" of the magazine. Veen on Dec 2, parent next [—]. Most people don't understand the underlying science, so they rely on science journalism to distill and explicate complex topics without simplifying and distorting to the point they lose any relationship with the truth. In this case, the writer has failed in their task; they've written a load of nonsense that actively undermines a reader's ability to comprehend the topic—in short, it's bullshit. I'm not disputing that the Quanta article is factually deficient - although I don't have the relevant specialist knowledge to understand why. Purely speaking for myself, but I could tell it was metaphorical. Given the "magazine" is still operating, and that I read some of the article.

If you want to destroy an ant colony, quanta magazine, the simplest method is just to prevent interfere with quanta magazine mechanisms they use to collaborate. But in reality, the underlying assumption is a false dichotomy. No-doubt their readership has increased, but I am no-longer these publications target market.

Quantum algorithms can find their way out of mazes exponentially faster than classical ones, at the cost of forgetting the paths they took. A chemical trick for making oxygen can sustain whole underground ecosystems. In steganography, an ordinary message masks the presence of a secret communication. Melanie Mitchell says digital minds will never truly be like ours until they can make analogies. The physicist and computer scientist Stephanie Wehner is planning and designing the next internet—a quantum one. Quantum computers are improving at a doubly exponential rate.

Listen to Quanta Magazine's in-depth news stories about developments in mathematics, theoretical physics, theoretical computer science and the basic life sciences. Quanta, an editorially independent magazine published by the Simons Foundation, seeks to enhance public understanding of basic research. Read more at QuantaMagazine. You've learned from Quanta. Now we want to learn from you!

Quanta magazine

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources. Founded in , Quanta Magazine QM is a hard science news site founded by the Simons Foundation and focused on recent advances in physics, mathematics, biology, and computer science.

Alphabet lore f in real life

His claim is that the Quantum article contains wildly false information. VLM on Dec 2, parent prev next [—] Magazines are for showing off ones political or philosophical affiliations, not to be informative. Quantum Physics September 27, Does this mean that the quantum system is a wormhole? I am beginning to think that advertising is the most toxic element of our environment. Xcelerate on Dec 2, parent next [—]. Funny how this is true for basically all of science and yet so many popsci authors get away with it, because the vast majority of the audience will not be experts in the field. I think a lot of excellent science and science reporting is taking place every day. But in reality, the underlying assumption is a false dichotomy. We strive to complement and augment existing media coverage. I found it very hard to read beyond this line. If, with good reason, we cannot trust the supposed sources of good information, even HN, then our ability to build common understandings and actions is destroyed. You say "ok, let's test these beautiful equations. Quantum Physics.

Send feedback.

The rainbow of pigments that animals use for blood illustrates a central truth about evolution. It makes ridiculous claims, fundamentally misrepresenting what this research is, to make it sound cooler and more interesting. Totally lying about it in order to make it more broadly appealing is pretty bad. Specifically, he claims a simulation was presented as an experiment. No offense, but choosing "The Death of Quanta Magazin" as the title for a rant about clickbaiting is quite ironic. The wormholes that Susskind et al. A chemical trick for making oxygen can sustain whole underground ecosystems. Some of it is built on assumptions about nature, of course, which leads a lot of people to assume that the enterprise is built on a house of cards, but even this is worth really digging in to. You can't have it both ways, you either accept gross misrepresentations in the popular science press, or you just don't have popular science press. With a fully sequenced genome in hand, scientists hope they are finally poised to learn how axolotls regenerate lost body parts. Mathematician Richard Schwartz explains why he loves problems he can start solving right away, and how computers can help. Not sure what you're seeing. Not to be confused with Quanta journal. The writer does not say he is "upset about lack of depth".