Kelsey piper ai
GPT-4 can pass the bar exam in the 90th percentile, while the previous model struggled around in the 10th percentile.
Good agreed; more recently, so did Stephen Hawking. These concerns predate the founding of any of the current labs building frontier AI, and the historical trajectory of these concerns is important to making sense of our present-day situation. To the extent that frontier labs do focus on safety, it is in large part due to advocacy by researchers who do not hold any financial stake in AI. But while the risk of human extinction from powerful AI systems is a long-standing concern and not a fringe one, the field of trying to figure out how to solve that problem was until very recently a fringe field, and that fact is profoundly important to understanding the landscape of AI safety work today. The enthusiastic participation of the latter suggests an obvious question: If building extremely powerful AI systems is understood by many AI researchers to possibly kill us, why is anyone doing it?
Kelsey piper ai
That might have people asking: Wait, what? But these grand worries are rooted in research. Along with Hawking and Musk, prominent figures at Oxford and UC Berkeley and many of the researchers working in AI today believe that advanced AI systems, if deployed carelessly, could permanently cut off human civilization from a good future. This concern has been raised since the dawn of computing. There are also skeptics. Others are worried that excessive hype about the power of their field might kill it prematurely. And even among the people who broadly agree that AI poses unique dangers, there are varying takes on what steps make the most sense today. Artificial intelligence is the effort to create computers capable of intelligent behavior. Narrow AI has seen extraordinary progress over the past few years. AI systems have improved dramatically at translation , at games like chess and Go , at important research biology questions like predicting how proteins fold , and at generating images. They compose music and write articles that, at a glance, read as if a human wrote them. They play strategy games. They are being developed to improve drone targeting and detect missiles. But narrow AI is getting less narrow.
Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter.
That might have people asking: Wait, what? But these grand worries are rooted in research. Along with Hawking and Musk, prominent figures at Oxford and UC Berkeley and many of the researchers working in AI today believe that advanced AI systems, if deployed carelessly, could permanently cut off human civilization from a good future. This concern has been raised since the dawn of computing. There are also skeptics. Others are worried that excessive hype about the power of their field might kill it prematurely.
Stephanie Sy Stephanie Sy. Layla Quran Layla Quran. In recent months, new artificial intelligence tools have garnered attention, and concern, over their ability to produce original work. The creations range from college-level essays to computer code and works of art. As Stephanie Sy reports, this technology could change how we live and work in profound ways. Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors.
Kelsey piper ai
Kelsey Piper is an American journalist who is a staff writer at Vox , where she writes for the column Future Perfect , which covers a variety of topics from an effective altruism perspective. While attending Stanford University, she founded and ran the Stanford Effective Altruism student organization. Piper blogs at The Unit of Caring. Around , while in high school, Piper developed an interest in the rationalist and effective altruism movements. Since , Piper has written for the Vox column Future Perfect , [6] which covers "the most critical issues of the day through the lens of effective altruism". Piper was an early responder to the COVID pandemic , discussing the risk of a serious global pandemic in February [9] and recommending measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing in March of the same year. Contents move to sidebar hide. Article Talk. Read Edit View history. Tools Tools.
Craigslist farmington nm
This means that decisions about how AIs are deployed also have important implications for safety. Understand the world with a daily explainer plus the most compelling stories of the day. Thanks for signing up! Oct 15 1 min read 1. But researchers there are active contributors to both AI safety and AI capabilities research. Ethics Statement Future Perfect coverage may include stories about organizations that writers have made personal donations to. Future Perfect prizes its editorial independence, and all editorial decisions are made separately from fundraising and commercial considerations. The Latest. To add a highlight: after selecting a passage, click the star. What does this worldview suggest about AI safety? Please enter a valid email and try again. Tolkien Thoughts?
GPT-4 can pass the bar exam in the 90th percentile, while the previous model struggled around in the 10th percentile. And on the advanced sommelier theory test, GPT-4 performed better than 77 percent of test-takers. These are stunning results — not just what the model can do, but the rapid pace of progress.
The economic implications will be enormous. The Run-Up. Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Eliezer Yudkowsky and the Machine Intelligence Research Institute are representative of this set of views. Read the rest of the article. Many of these people are working at cross-purposes, and many of them disagree on what the core features of the problem are, how much of a problem it is, and what will likely happen if we fail to solve it. Who fakes cancer research? If superintelligent AIs outnumber humans, think faster than humans, and are deeply integrated into every aspect of the economy, an AI takeover seems plausible — even if they never become smarter than we are. I'm not sure if it's the best intro, but it seems like a contender. These concerns predate the founding of any of the current labs building frontier AI, and the historical trajectory of these concerns is important to making sense of our present-day situation.
I consider, that you are mistaken. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.